Ol' Blue Eyes. King For A Couple Of Days Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 4816
August 19th, 2005 at 01:46pm
we shouldn't have weapons of mass destruction.
if we all have them,
we'll start blowing up anyone who pisses us off.
you know, like,
the world leaders will be at a conferance someday
and japan's world leader will poke russia's world leader in the ribs.
then russia will get pissed off and bomb japan.
Ol' Blue Eyes. King For A Couple Of Days Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 4816
August 22nd, 2005 at 05:10am
we shouldn't have weapons of mass destruction.
HUMANS in general shouldn't have weapons of mass destruction.
we're too immature for them.
eberneezer_egghead Falling In Love With The Board Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 5484
August 22nd, 2005 at 06:20pm
I understand why you think we're hypocritical. I suppose the government feel that our nuclear bombs are an act of defence or revenge...
Kitti Falling In Love With The Board Age: 33 Gender: Female Posts: 5688
August 22nd, 2005 at 06:29pm
what our government "thinks" or "knows" doesnt mean shit to me because they are all about self preservation and i HATE THAT...its not a good way to run a country. you do whats best for the people not the government.
personally, i dont think america has any right to go off at another country for havin Nukes coz they have more than anyone else. theyve only been used twice, but that was in WWII, and it ended the war. i think the guy who invented them should have destroyed the plans, removed all evidence. Nukes are gonna destroy the world, we all know it, so we should stop the bastards now. there is a very relevant, although rather amusing, avatar that exists about this, there is also a flash movie.
It scares me how realistic that is. North Korea is now testing some out, it's just scary. So much destruction at the push of a button. We dont need that, no country does. Sadly, when other countries have it, you have to stay on their level or you will be pushed over. If we didnt have Nukes and other countries did... we wouldnt be a country for very long.
suzie_k Falling In Love With The Board Age: 38 Gender: Female Posts: 8288
July 8th, 2006 at 04:59pm
The Human Being is the weapon of mass destruction.
You have a point there suzie_k as I remember watching a wild life program where 2 guys compete to find the better animal and on this particular one they had to find the Animal kingdoms worst villan and they both came up with the same answer but different stories about how no prizes for guessing who OK maybe you can I have a cookie but thats all.
suzie_k Falling In Love With The Board Age: 38 Gender: Female Posts: 8288
July 8th, 2006 at 06:02pm
EvilChicken:
You have a point there suzie_k as I remember watching a wild life program where 2 guys compete to find the better animal and on this particular one they had to find the Animal kingdoms worst villan and they both came up with the same answer but different stories about how no prizes for guessing who OK maybe you can I have a cookie but thats all.
It is true though.
No other species kills for no reason.
Animals kill each other rarely.
And if they do it's for mating privileges and or if they are starving.
Humans do it for nothing.
It scares me how realistic that is. North Korea is now testing some out, it's just scary. So much destruction at the push of a button. We dont need that, no country does. Sadly, when other countries have it, you have to stay on their level or you will be pushed over. If we didnt have Nukes and other countries did... we wouldnt be a country for very long.
wow, someone found it!
spill_no_sick Falling In Love With The Board Age: 30 Gender: - Posts: 8588
July 9th, 2006 at 05:51pm
[XxXflowerfairyXxX]:
It's getting to the point here the world is just plain scary. Nukes shouldn't even excist. The guy who invented them hated himself. I hate the way you can't turn on the news without hearing about the latest country that has restarted up their nuclear weapons program...
"do you think that when that guy invinted the bomb a black light poped over his head?" - Mitch Hedberg
I decided to say something since this isn't all year oldy and such and SD has more unwritten rules to go by and we're all developed and blah blah blah
we're trying to keep this out of the hands of people who aren't regulated or who are likely to use it
if the U.S. gets rid of it then we have North Korea and the Middle East (over 600 WMDs were found last month for all you who get your information from anti-Bush sites) who are "ready and willing"
the U.S. saves them for worst case senarios
(and yes, we are cocky and really do forget that the rest of the world isn't some poor people jungle
It's getting to the point here the world is just plain scary. Nukes shouldn't even excist. The guy who invented them hated himself. I hate the way you can't turn on the news without hearing about the latest country that has restarted up their nuclear weapons program...
"do you think that when that guy invinted the bomb a black light poped over his head?" - Mitch Hedberg
I decided to say something since this isn't all year oldy and such and SD has more unwritten rules to go by and we're all developed and blah blah blah
we're trying to keep this out of the hands of people who aren't regulated or who are likely to use it
if the U.S. gets rid of it then we have North Korea and the Middle East (over 600 WMDs were found last month for all you who get your information from anti-Bush sites) who are "ready and willing"
the U.S. saves them for worst case senarios
(and yes, we are cocky and really do forget that the rest of the world isn't some poor people jungle
no offence, but which country is the only one to actually have USED WMDs? thats right, AMERICA.
no offence, but which country is the only one to actually have USED WMDs? thats right, AMERICA.
And it was needed when we did.
So what? Since America is the only country to use them, lets ignore all the countries testing them out and designing them, no thread there
"threat"
but good point
this thread should be retitled, "could the world not have WMDs?"
So you're saying certain countries should have WMD to stop others from causing harm with them?
Fair enough but if America neutralised the world of WMD would they disable their own? Would they fuck. No one would have them. WMDs do actually what it says on the tin; they kill people, no good can come of them.
no offence, but which country is the only one to actually have USED WMDs? thats right, AMERICA.
And it was needed when we did.
So what? Since America is the only country to use them, lets ignore all the countries testing them out and designing them, no thread there
"threat"
but good point
this thread should be retitled, "could the world not have WMDs?"
So you're saying certain countries should have WMD to stop others from causing harm with them?
Fair enough but if America neutralised the world of WMD would they disable their own? Would they fuck. No one would have them. WMDs do actually what it says on the tin; they kill people, no good can come of them.
if no countries had them, America still would coz they would want to be superior, sorry, just human nature, were all bastards
