You guys, this is a really serious issue that needs to be spread around. This video shows what is done to animals who are being used for dissection.
If you have a weak stomach, who cares. Just watch the video. I hope it changes your mind about dissection. Cats are tortured alive and a dog gets it's head slammed in a car door. Animals are beaten with metal rods. The managers of the building that prepares these animals for dissection in schools lie about what goes on inside.
Matt Smith Admin Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 31134
October 17th, 2006 at 06:28pm
We only perform heart dissections at my school.
I'm cool with that. It was actually fascinating, really.
I'm opposed to a ban because I found it about a hundred times more educational than anything i've ever done in Biology class. Thats because I learn by doing things. Not from textbooks or simulations, but thats just me.
Besides, the hearts were only going to get eaten anyway, might as well have used them for something educational.
Well first off thats a PETA video, no offense to those who support Peta, but they are a bunch of extremeist political fools in my opinion. Do you see them out their doing anything? No, they put little videos on the internet to cause issues. They want the publicity, and actually helping animals becomes a second priority and that really aggitates me.
Not every single company that provides animals to schools is like that. Disecting animals can provide a more hands on experience for students, which is better for learning. However I am strongly against the needless slaughtering of animals. Animals that die of natural causes I am fine with being used for disection (and those companies to exist) but for high school students I don't find it needed. They arent testing out drugs to benifit the human race or making break through medical discoveries, it's a high school biology course or some science course.
I don't think it should be banned all together, but I hate the fact that it is mandatory in so many schools. It is in mine and I refuse to disect a mouse, which basically means I will be failing biology 1st quarter but I honestly don't care. I'm not a murdered and the mice they use did not die of natural causes.
i think, there is some thing wrong with disecting animal alive or being creul before the disection, if you are omly disecting something that was gonna be eaten, then its alright
spill_no_sick Falling In Love With The Board Age: 30 Gender: - Posts: 8588
October 18th, 2006 at 03:11pm
sorry, but you forgot the other option, "I don't think it's cruel, but it is disgusting"
I know you're pro-PETA so already you have a pretty biased background, but you aren't allowed to be one-sided in your opening argument, you have to be general and make it an open discussion, not a "agree with me or you're the stupid one" post
those posts are pwned by me, Steph, Anji, or Kitti later
spill_no_sick Falling In Love With The Board Age: 30 Gender: - Posts: 8588
October 18th, 2006 at 03:12pm
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Well first off thats a PETA video, no offense to those who support Peta, but they are a bunch of extremeist political fools in my opinion. Do you see them out their doing anything? No, they put little videos on the internet to cause issues. They want the publicity, and actually helping animals becomes a second priority and that really aggitates me.
Not every single company that provides animals to schools is like that. Disecting animals can provide a more hands on experience for students, which is better for learning. However I am strongly against the needless slaughtering of animals. Animals that die of natural causes I am fine with being used for disection (and those companies to exist) but for high school students I don't find it needed. They arent testing out drugs to benifit the human race or making break through medical discoveries, it's a high school biology course or some science course.
I don't think it should be banned all together, but I hate the fact that it is mandatory in so many schools. It is in mine and I refuse to disect a mouse, which basically means I will be failing biology 1st quarter but I honestly don't care. I'm not a murdered and the mice they use did not die of natural causes.
Oh, don't worry. We'll get at least 20 pages of "zomg teh poor animalz" and you can pwn all those
Brendon Urie.. King For A Couple Of Days Age: 36 Gender: Female Posts: 2394
October 18th, 2006 at 10:38pm
I've always thought that they could easily make a computer program where you virtually dissect an animal. When I was in middle school I didn't want to dissect because of the gross factor. Now that I'm older I wouldn't dissect for other reasons, but fortunately I never had to make that decision again.
I've never had to do anything other than a chicken leg, but ive watched my teacher do other things and it made me feel sick. besides, what purpose does it really serve? if you want to do it, fine by me but it shouldnt be compulsory because you shouldnt fail a GCSE or something because of you're moral beliefs. in my mind thats like saying someone should fail Religion because they're muslim. which is stupid im sure everyone agrees
Lucifers Angel King For A Couple Of Days Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 4751
October 19th, 2006 at 12:23pm
animal cruelty i have no time for but animal dissection is somtimes a good thing, it helps children learn and it also helps medical research,
Ok so some of the animals are put in conditions they really shouldn't and i don't agree with that. But this isn't the case for all animals. I totally agree with disection for medical and biological purposes. Having watched disection at school I think it's fascinating.
I want to go to medical school, you disect real human bodies there.......cool, eh?
steady riot. King For A Couple Of Days Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 2907
October 19th, 2006 at 04:58pm
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Well first off thats a PETA video, no offense to those who support Peta, but they are a bunch of extremeist political fools in my opinion. Do you see them out their doing anything? No, they put little videos on the internet to cause issues. They want the publicity, and actually helping animals becomes a second priority and that really aggitates me.
Not every single company that provides animals to schools is like that. Disecting animals can provide a more hands on experience for students, which is better for learning. However I am strongly against the needless slaughtering of animals. Animals that die of natural causes I am fine with being used for disection (and those companies to exist) but for high school students I don't find it needed. They arent testing out drugs to benifit the human race or making break through medical discoveries, it's a high school biology course or some science course.
I don't think it should be banned all together, but I hate the fact that it is mandatory in so many schools. It is in mine and I refuse to disect a mouse, which basically means I will be failing biology 1st quarter but I honestly don't care. I'm not a murdered and the mice they use did not die of natural causes.
You obviously don't know much about PETA, then. I'm a supporter, and they have many things. Animal liberation- It's their first priority. And they put those videos up so that they can inform people of whats actually happening. It's not as believable when it's just in writing, but when you see the videos, then it's believable.
I'm against the dissection of animals, not just because I'm a vegetarian.
I've got a very weak stomach, and even before I was a vegetarian, I always thought it was wrong and gross.
I don't think it's right the way they get them. They're bred to do this, and then "harvested." I hold the same opinion on this, as I do with the slaughter of animals for food. There are other alternatives to this. They have computer programs that show you the exact samething. It's cruelty-free and it's not messy.
You obviously don't know much about PETA, then. I'm a supporter, and they have many things. Animal liberation- It's their first priority. And they put those videos up so that they can inform people of whats actually happening. It's not as believable when it's just in writing, but when you see the videos, then it's believable.
Im going to make a thread for activist groups before we get way off topic
spill_no_sick Falling In Love With The Board Age: 30 Gender: - Posts: 8588
October 19th, 2006 at 05:44pm
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Baby, I'm an Anarchist:
You obviously don't know much about PETA, then. I'm a supporter, and they have many things. Animal liberation- It's their first priority. And they put those videos up so that they can inform people of whats actually happening. It's not as believable when it's just in writing, but when you see the videos, then it's believable.
Im going to make a thread for activist groups before we get way off topic
yeah, you are uninformed...I happen to love their propaganda and since I have a weak stomach they're obviously right...I mean, IT APPLIES DIRECTLY TO ME!
now this is me speaking: you're mod, isn't there some rule saying that they have to put fair choices on polls or give both sides of the issue in the opening statement?
Matt Smith Admin Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 31134
October 19th, 2006 at 05:47pm
Baby, I'm an Anarchist:
There are other alternatives to this. They have computer programs that show you the exact samething. It's cruelty-free and it's not messy.
Cruelty free and non-educational. Because that totally denies Kinesthetic learners their right to education. Clicking away at a computer screen is no good for some when they can actually slice an aorta open with their own hands and see exactly what it looks like and feel it with their own hands.
Uhm, this is a slight side track, but medical students disect animals (and humans). But would you actually feel safe if your surgeon had never actually touched real flesh and done all of his or her training via a computer?.
spill_no_sick:
now this is me speaking: you're mod, isn't there some rule saying that they have to put fair choices on polls or give both sides of the issue in the opening statement?
Actually, in the section rules there is no rule about polls. They don't actually matter, per se..
Plus, you only have to give your own opinion. According to the section rules.
now this is me speaking: you're mod, isn't there some rule saying that they have to put fair choices on polls or give both sides of the issue in the opening statement?
Actually you have to put your opinion in a post, but if you post links to a bunch of one sides sites your opinion obviously wouldnt be taken as seriously. Like in the activist thread I made I posted how I felt about PETA, but I also linked back to their official site so people can form their own opinions
spill_no_sick Falling In Love With The Board Age: 30 Gender: - Posts: 8588
October 19th, 2006 at 08:06pm
[QUOTE="Baby, Ithen on that note, I voted "I don't know enough" which means, "I don't think it's wrong what's wrong is one-sided assholes like PETA"
