Cure for Cervical found...but not being distributed

Well as you can tell by the title, Cervical Cancer now has a cure.

-Cervical cancer infects 10,000 women per year and on average it kills 3,600 on average each year.

The cure is being "put on hold" because conservatives have come out and protested it saying that:

-This drug prevents a certian type of STD as well as cures cervical cancer, they believe this information will make young women have unprotected/pre-merital sex.


Now, what are your thoughts on this? In my personal opinion just because I know this drug prevents an STD it won't make me go "Hot damn! Let me go find a man!" So stop worrying about that crap and worry about the 3,600 dieing every year.

So, what do you think?

I think it's a load of crap that they're not distributing it. I mean, they have found a way to CURE a certain type of CANCER! and they're worried about more people having pre-marital sex/unprotected sex? I don't think it's going to make much of a difference there, I mean, condoms prevent certain STD's and such, so why are THOSE out for public distribution? Isn't it kind of the same concept?

I think it's horrible that they're worried about that when they can cure a deadly form of cancer. I mean, yeah it is horrible to have unprotected sex if you're not married, there are a lot of things that can happen. (std's, unwanted pregnancy, ect) But I mean, they should be jumping at the chance to be able to help women with cancer.

What a bunch of bullshit.

so they're just going to let thousands of women die, despite being able to prevent it?

ARRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

That's AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!

Where was it invented, if you know?

Jesus thats a load of shit! people are dieing and they're arent distributing CURE for a kind of CANCER!!! its not going to make a difference really!! sure it cures STD but wouldnt it be easier just to use a condom??!!! if the girl was responsible enough to have sex she should be responsible enough to know the easiest cure of a STD is preventment from getting one by wearing a condom! I mean sure its bad to have pre_marital/unprotected sex cause of STDs and pregnancy but they could save so many women's lives!

Thats wrong on so many different levels. These people need to get their priorities right, so what if girls are stupid enough to go out and have unprotected sex, think of the women who are suffering from cancer. What value does that place on life, if people are more concerned about unprotected/pre-marital sex than saving lives?

bloodraine:

Thats wrong on so many different levels. These people need to get their priorities right, so what if girls are stupid enough to go out and have unprotected sex, think of the women who are suffering from cancer. What value does that place on life, if people are more concerned about unprotected/pre-marital sex than saving lives?

I think they're worried about more teen-pregnancies, I can understand why they are worried but they should come up with a good compromise. Maybe some way for the drug to only be distributed among those who have the cancer. They wouldn't be putting these in drugstores where anyone can buy them anyway.

Walking_Towards_The_Light:

bloodraine:

Thats wrong on so many different levels. These people need to get their priorities right, so what if girls are stupid enough to go out and have unprotected sex, think of the women who are suffering from cancer. What value does that place on life, if people are more concerned about unprotected/pre-marital sex than saving lives?

I think they're worried about more teen-pregnancies, I can understand why they are worried but they should come up with a good compromise. Maybe some way for the drug to only be distributed among those who have the cancer. They wouldn't be putting these in drugstores where anyone can buy them anyway.

Yes, but would you rather have an increase in Teen pregnacies or an increase in cervical cancer deaths?. But you have a point about the distribution of these drugs, and their avalability over-the-counter. It is simple enough to make these drugs available on prescription to the people who need it, rather than everyone who wants to buy them.

Soo stupid.

Nine_Inch_Nails:

ARRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

That's AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!

Where was it invented, if you know?

It was on the radio, they never said where it was invented.

September_has_Ended:

Well as you can tell by the title, Cervical Cancer now has a cure.

-Cervical cancer infects 10,000 women per year and on average it kills 3,600 on average each year.

The cure is being "put on hold" because conservatives have come out and protested it saying that:

-This drug prevents a certian type of STD as well as cures cervical cancer, they believe this information will make young women have unprotected/pre-merital sex.


Now, what are your thoughts on this? In my personal opinion just because I know this drug prevents an STD it won't make me go "Hot damn! Let me go find a man!" So stop worrying about that crap and worry about the 3,600 dieing every year.

So, what do you think?

... I say we take whatever moron voted against putting out there and we shoot him. But, hey, that's just MHO.
I mean, if anything, the whole STD thing is an added bonus because it's ONE less thing we all have to worry about in the world. So friggin what if the whores want to go out and screw twenty guys, unprotected. That's their choice, not the cancer victims whose lives are at stake.

® Billie Joe:

September_has_Ended:

Well as you can tell by the title, Cervical Cancer now has a cure.

-Cervical cancer infects 10,000 women per year and on average it kills 3,600 on average each year.

The cure is being "put on hold" because conservatives have come out and protested it saying that:

-This drug prevents a certian type of STD as well as cures cervical cancer, they believe this information will make young women have unprotected/pre-merital sex.


Now, what are your thoughts on this? In my personal opinion just because I know this drug prevents an STD it won't make me go "Hot damn! Let me go find a man!" So stop worrying about that crap and worry about the 3,600 dieing every year.

So, what do you think?

... I say we take whatever moron voted against putting out there and we shoot him. But, hey, that's just MHO.
I mean, if anything, the whole STD thing is an added bonus because it's ONE less thing we all have to worry about in the world. So friggin what if the whores want to go out and screw twenty guys, unprotected. That's their choice, not the cancer victims whose lives are at stake.

you go girl or guy lol

Fade2Black:

® Billie Joe:

September_has_Ended:

Well as you can tell by the title, Cervical Cancer now has a cure.

-Cervical cancer infects 10,000 women per year and on average it kills 3,600 on average each year.

The cure is being "put on hold" because conservatives have come out and protested it saying that:

-This drug prevents a certian type of STD as well as cures cervical cancer, they believe this information will make young women have unprotected/pre-merital sex.


Now, what are your thoughts on this? In my personal opinion just because I know this drug prevents an STD it won't make me go "Hot damn! Let me go find a man!" So stop worrying about that crap and worry about the 3,600 dieing every year.

So, what do you think?

... I say we take whatever moron voted against putting out there and we shoot him. But, hey, that's just MHO.
I mean, if anything, the whole STD thing is an added bonus because it's ONE less thing we all have to worry about in the world. So friggin what if the whores want to go out and screw twenty guys, unprotected. That's their choice, not the cancer victims whose lives are at stake.

you go girl or guy lol

*checks* ... Yeah, I'm a girl =P

wow.. if it prevents an STD also then that should be even more reason to distribute it. wtf.. i'm not gonna go out and have premarital or unprotected sex because of it.. there are other STDs to be had too so obviously i'm not going to do that. it doesn't prevent ALL STDs..

thats just about the dumbest shit ive ever heard.
it prevents an STD and cures cervical cancer-----what could be better?

thats almost like fucking murder if the distribution is not being released when it can save thousands of women.

bloodraine:

Walking_Towards_The_Light:

bloodraine:

Thats wrong on so many different levels. These people need to get their priorities right, so what if girls are stupid enough to go out and have unprotected sex, think of the women who are suffering from cancer. What value does that place on life, if people are more concerned about unprotected/pre-marital sex than saving lives?

I think they're worried about more teen-pregnancies, I can understand why they are worried but they should come up with a good compromise. Maybe some way for the drug to only be distributed among those who have the cancer. They wouldn't be putting these in drugstores where anyone can buy them anyway.

Yes, but would you rather have an increase in Teen pregnacies or an increase in cervical cancer deaths?

The kids will end up on the streets.. so it's basically the same thing because either way innocent lives will be either ruined or ended.

anyone who decides not to put the cure out on release for the public should try living with cervical cancer for a day or two and then lets see how fast they change they're minds. Because cervical cancer is the hardest thing a woman could face in her life, it leads to hysterectomys and ablations.

Walking_Towards_The_Light:

bloodraine:

Walking_Towards_The_Light:

bloodraine:

Thats wrong on so many different levels. These people need to get their priorities right, so what if girls are stupid enough to go out and have unprotected sex, think of the women who are suffering from cancer. What value does that place on life, if people are more concerned about unprotected/pre-marital sex than saving lives?

I think they're worried about more teen-pregnancies, I can understand why they are worried but they should come up with a good compromise. Maybe some way for the drug to only be distributed among those who have the cancer. They wouldn't be putting these in drugstores where anyone can buy them anyway.

Yes, but would you rather have an increase in Teen pregnacies or an increase in cervical cancer deaths?

The kids will end up on the streets.. so it's basically the same thing because either way innocent lives will be either ruined or ended.

Not all children born out of a teenage pregnancy life a deprived life. My best friend being one of them. But i think we're going a little OT about this teen pregnancy thing, if kids want to go out and ruin their lives, then fine. Women with cervical cancer shouldn't suffer because of this.

i am having to have an hysterectomy due to the fact that they found cancer cells on my cervics and i blame the doctors all the time i told them every week that i was in pain and i couldnt live like anymore so they sent me for ablations and scrapes, but all the treatments didnt work, i spent 2 years going to the doctors and they were just dissmissing me and giving me this tablet that tablet and i am so angry that now i have to go through a big operation just because they fucked up. luckely i have finished having my kids and my family is complete but hey i shouldnt have to be going through the operation which is due to be done in January 13th my daughters birthday.