Conservapedia? give me a fucking break

today there was a article on "Conservapedia" in the Chicago tribune I was upset that people think they can go create a purposely biased version of Wikipedia, witch at least tries to be fair.


Lets look at some things this “A conservative encyclopedia you can trust.” Says

First of all, the page on Al Gore has a Criticism section, but president bush who has a 34% approval rating has no mention of Criticism.

If you take a look at the links for Al Gore they are titled

1.“ ↑ 2000 Presidential Election Results
2.↑ Al Gore, Hypocrite
3.↑ [1]
4.↑ More Inconvenient Truths About Al Gore
5.↑ Tennessee Mine Enriched Gore, Scarred Land”

This is clearly biased against Al Gore.


On the article of the unpopular Ann Coulter it says

“her outspokenness against all those who wish to hurt the United States”

You know who’s trying to hurt the united states? People like Ann who think they can accuse anyone who voices there opposition to the US government of being “un-American” that is un American it self because part of why America is great is that you can voice opposition to the government, its called “freedom of speech” and if you don’t like it you can go move to Iran or north Korea.

Here is a very clear lie in the page on France

“Despite evidence that Saddam Hussein was producing chemical and biological weapons which were found and destroyed by US troops”

Do I really need to explain this to you? No we all no that no WMDs were found.

im sure i chould find more bullshit but i dont have all day

Posted on April 3rd, 2007 at 01:47pm

Comments

Post a comment


You have to log in before you post a comment.

Site info | Contact | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy

2024 © GeekStinkBreath.net
Register