I'm not entirely sure I'd have an abortion. Though I think that in some cases it can be right. For example if a woman became pregnant because she was raped, then I'd think she has the right to have an abortion. It can also be the lesser of two evils if the child is not going to be loved by either of the parents because they don't feel capable to look after him/her.
I agree with you on the matter of abortion for rape.
As for the "they won't be loved", that could be true, in which case they should be put up for adoption or in the care of someone who would. Just because the parents wouldnt take responsabilty for their actions is no reason to take away someones one chance at life.
i agre with you, there are loads and loads of couples out there who cant have children for one reason or another, the children should be adopted by them and given the child and family a chance at happiness, even in cases of rape i find it hard to see why you would want to have an abortion, its not the childs fault so why should they be punished, it wasnt they're fault.
Maybe they need to get over it because nothing gives you the right to kill something else for your benifit.
They Had Sex, now they're pregnant. When they chose to have sex, they were all risking having to give Birth. Thats just how it works.
Lucifers Angel King For A Couple Of Days Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 4751
September 1st, 2006 at 06:39am
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Feeling this!:
... maybe they don't want to give a birth?
Maybe they need to get over it because nothing gives you the right to kill something else for your benifit.
They Had Sex, now they're pregnant. When they chose to have sex, they were all risking having to give Birth. Thats just how it works.
thankyou thats what i think aswell, how do we know that the feotus doesnt feel anything when they are ripped from the warm and safe womb?
Miley Cyrus Basket Case Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 15185
September 3rd, 2006 at 11:56am
I_worship_tre_Cool:
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
Miley Cyrus Basket Case Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 15185
September 3rd, 2006 at 11:58am
Lucifers Angel:
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Feeling this!:
... maybe they don't want to give a birth?
Maybe they need to get over it because nothing gives you the right to kill something else for your benifit.
They Had Sex, now they're pregnant. When they chose to have sex, they were all risking having to give Birth. Thats just how it works.
thankyou thats what i think aswell, how do we know that the feotus doesnt feel anything when they are ripped from the warm and safe womb?
Actually, we do know that, and it doesn't feel anything until four months. And no one has an abortion after even three months.
Miley Cyrus Basket Case Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 15185
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:00pm
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Miss Katy:
I'm still on the fence about this whole issue.
I'm not entirely sure I'd have an abortion. Though I think that in some cases it can be right. For example if a woman became pregnant because she was raped, then I'd think she has the right to have an abortion. It can also be the lesser of two evils if the child is not going to be loved by either of the parents because they don't feel capable to look after him/her.
I agree with you on the matter of abortion for rape.
As for the "they won't be loved", that could be true, in which case they should be put up for adoption or in the care of someone who would. Just because the parents wouldnt take responsabilty for their actions is no reason to take away someones one chance at life.
Seeing as every time a man masturbates he's wasting tons of "could be life", you'd be against that, too?
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
but it is alive.... just because your morals don't kick in until it looks like a human doesnt mean it is any less important.
Miley Cyrus Basket Case Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 15185
September 3rd, 2006 at 04:09pm
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Sheepless and redundant:
I_worship_tre_Cool:
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
but it is alive.... just because your morals don't kick in until it looks like a human doesnt mean it is any less important.
Sperm doesn't look like a human yet, so according to your argument, you must be against male masturbation. It's a future child, after all.
GD Addicts Anonymous Falling In Love With The Board Age: 33 Gender: Female Posts: 5896
September 3rd, 2006 at 11:46pm
Sheepless and redundant:
I_worship_tre_Cool:
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
Sure, the baby hasn't been born yet, but I still consider it as life. According to my knowledge by the time a woman has an abortion the baby is already developing lungs and might even have a beating heart. And for me that beating heart kind of represents life, also I think the baby's starting to breathe. But maybe that's just me.
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
but it is alive.... just because your morals don't kick in until it looks like a human doesnt mean it is any less important.
so do you not move in fear of taking something life?
Plants are alive, you probably have picked a flower or stepped on one, or eaten a living, growing fruit off of a tree?
Maybe you've eaten a cow? That's alive and you encouraged more cows death by taking part in the consumption of one.
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
but it is alive.... just because your morals don't kick in until it looks like a human doesnt mean it is any less important.
so do you not move in fear of taking something life?
Plants are alive, you probably have picked a flower or stepped on one, or eaten a living, growing fruit off of a tree?
Maybe you've eaten a cow? That's alive and you encouraged more cows death by taking part in the consumption of one.
actually, eating meat is a completely natural thing to do, it has been done for millenia by humans and animals and it is done so that the consumer can live. abortion seems to be pointless demise of a life, it benifits no one.
Are you going to justify either one?
Abortion has been done for millenia.....it does HELP people.....a fetus still hasn't been proven as being human life. Hence the contraversy.
Humans live just fine without consuming, living, breathing animals.
They eat cows because they choose to kill a helpless animal and then consume it that gets you absolutely nowhere.
spill_no_sick Falling In Love With The Board Age: 31 Gender: - Posts: 8588
September 4th, 2006 at 02:38pm
Robot:
Are you going to justify either one?
Abortion has been done for millenia.....it does HELP people.....a fetus still hasn't been proven as being human life. Hence the contraversy.
Humans live just fine without consuming, living, breathing animals.
They eat cows because they choose to kill a helpless animal and then consume it that gets you absolutely nowhere.
it doesn't matter how long something has been done, it doesn't make it right or wrong
meat is a healthy part of diet (which is irrelevant) and abortion is murder
it should only be allowed in case of abortion
Nine_Inch_Nails Falling In Love With The Board Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 8334
September 4th, 2006 at 02:57pm
one of the reasons i agree with abortions is that it can ruin people's lifes.
if i got pregnant now, i know i would definatly have one, because i just...COULDNT have it. not now. it would ruin my life totally.
it's the same for thousands of teens.
& before anyone says "well then you shouldnt have sex". i dont agree with that at all. i think if you feel ready for sex, you shouldnt deny it to yourself. pregnancy & STIs aside, sex is actually good for your body.
i understand why people say it's murder, i see their point of view. but i also say that the mother of that child shouldnt have to suffer the pregnancy & labour if her heart isnt 100% into it. i really do think it's the mother's choice, & i dont like seeing people getting on their moral high horses & basically calling these people murderers. these women & girls obviously think what they are doing is for the best, & i know for a lot of them it's an extremely hard decision to reach. so some people should just back off sometimes.
Are you going to justify either one?
Abortion has been done for millenia.....it does HELP people.....a fetus still hasn't been proven as being human life. Hence the contraversy.
Humans live just fine without consuming, living, breathing animals.
They eat cows because they choose to kill a helpless animal and then consume it that gets you absolutely nowhere.
it doesn't matter how long something has been done, it doesn't make it right or wrong
meat is a healthy part of diet (which is irrelevant) and abortion is murder
it should only be allowed in case of abortion
Eating a dead fetus is a healthy part of a diet, which yes it is done.
I was saying it's been done for a long time, because that person said that eating cows has been done for a long time.
If you want healthy, birthing something that has turned into a baby is NOT healthy for you. Getting it removed before it is fully developed would be healthier.
Eating cows meat, and bi products from cows has been proven unhealthy many times.
Please don't just come in and be like "ITS RIGHT AND THATS WRONG BECAUSE I SAY SO"!
Your assumptions are completely unfactual.
Matt Smith Admin Age: 33 Gender: Female Posts: 31134
September 4th, 2006 at 03:43pm
Robot:
Eating a dead fetus is a healthy part of a diet, which yes it is done.
I was saying it's been done for a long time, because that person said that eating cows has been done for a long time.
If you want healthy, birthing something that has turned into a baby is NOT healthy for you. Getting it removed before it is fully developed would be healthier.
Eating cows meat, and bi products from cows has been proven unhealthy many times.
Please don't just come in and be like "ITS RIGHT AND THATS WRONG BECAUSE I SAY SO"!
Your assumptions are completely unfactual.
No. That my children, is cannibalism and is frowned upon in many societies.
It is far from healthy. When a species consumes a member of its own species, bad stuff tends to happen. CJD in europe, anyone?. I chellenge you to find a dcotor who prescribes a freshly aborted foetus as a nourishing part of a healthy and blanced diet.
Methinks you are getting confused with Placenta consumption, which is particularly traditional in Chinese and Vietnamese culture.
Miley Cyrus Basket Case Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 15185
September 4th, 2006 at 05:46pm
Sheepless and redundant:
I_worship_tre_Cool:
Sheepless and redundant:
I_worship_tre_Cool:
They already made their Choice, they had sex and she got pregnant. They should not be allowed to kill something because of their mistake so that they can benifit.
It's not killing if it's not life. It could potentially be life, but it's not yet.
but it is alive.... just because your morals don't kick in until it looks like a human doesnt mean it is any less important.
Sperm doesn't look like a human yet, so according to your argument, you must be against male masturbation. It's a future child, after all.
it depends what the circumstances of the abortion are.
if like the the girl gets raped..and isnt ready for a child, she should be able to have a abortion. o
or if you have protected sex but say the condom breaks and you manage to get pregnant, and you arent ready for children then yeah. you could say yeah but you could be killing the person to invent a cure for cancer..but the mother could be the one who creates the cure for cancer.and how can she pursue a career really if she has a child??
but if your just a whore sleeping round who gets pregnant.....then its your own fault really.
No. That my children, is cannibalism and is frowned upon in many societies.
It is far from healthy. When a species consumes a member of its own species, bad stuff tends to happen. CJD in europe, anyone?. I chellenge you to find a dcotor who prescribes a freshly aborted foetus as a nourishing part of a healthy and blanced diet.
Methinks you are getting confused with Placenta consumption, which is particularly traditional in Chinese and Vietnamese culture.
My point was that meat is not as good for you as you think....my fetus thing was more sarcistic than anything. Because some one who says 'cows are good for you', 'abortion is murder'...and nothing else really....
Domesticated cows have been proven many times to be bad for you. Abortion has never been proven to be murder.
I challenge you to find a doctor who will prescribe anything healthy.
Sperm doesn't look like a human yet, so according to your argument, you must be against male masturbation. It's a future child, after all.
Yeah, Sperm Doesnt look human because it has no potential at becoming a human life without sex, and a female egg. Sperm NEVER will develop into a human life, ever. It isnt a human life, they are just cells, like any cells on your body. However when it comes in contact with cells from another person, it is something else entirely. Now it is no longer "your cell", it is the life of something else that has potential to develop into a human being. When you make the choice to have sex, you have the potential to create something thats alive, a human. Despite whatever you want to sugar coat it and call it, what has been created are living human cells, and what do cells turn in to? PEOPLE.
Last Time I checked, the wrongful killing of something is muder. Now, lets define wrongful. I would say that killing something for your benifit is wrongful. You can not justify allowing someone else to pay for your actions with it's life. Thats cruel and its wrong.
