Why Don't You Believe?

NeoSteph:

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

i know about hte medical reasons , what kind of reward , going to heaven big friggin deal

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

i know about hte medical reasons , what kind of reward , going to heaven big friggin deal

Living for all eternity in paradise?

That is a pretty big deal.

NeoSteph:

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

It was also thought to be impossible to walk on the moon or to clone cells.

Viva La Stupid:

how do you know its "paradise" , for all you know its could be nohing , it could be a trick

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

i know about hte medical reasons , what kind of reward , going to heaven big friggin deal

Living for all eternity in paradise?

That is a pretty big deal.

how do you know its "paradise" , for all you know its could be nohing , it could be a trick

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

i know about hte medical reasons , what kind of reward , going to heaven big friggin deal

Living for all eternity in paradise?

That is a pretty big deal.

how do you know its "paradise" , for all you know its could be nohing , it could be a trick

NeoSteph:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

i know about hte medical reasons , what kind of reward , going to heaven big friggin deal

Living for all eternity in paradise?

That is a pretty big deal.

how do you know its "paradise" , for all you know its could be nohing , it could be a trick

Ah yes god created us, gives us intelligence and free will, sends his only son to earth to be murdered for our sins and in the end when we die just before we melt into nothingness god pops and says ''just kidding''!!!

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

It was also thought to be impossible to walk on the moon or to clone cells.

yes. but find an example of walking on water with out any type of tchnology , its physically impossible to walk on water

NeoSteph:

Yes i completely agree it's impossible for a man with no technology involved to walk on water............but then most men aren't born with the spirit of god are they.

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

Yes i completely agree it's impossible for a man with no technology involved to walk on water............but then most men aren't born with the spirit of god are they.

Or then again, the walking on water account could have been somewhat garbled in the first place.

It only takes a tiny bit of diversion from the original story, a tiny little mis-translation of the Bible, and it can result in stories such as that.

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

Bloodraine:

Viva La Stupid:

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

There are plenty of medical reasons why a person may be unconscious for three days but suddenly regain consciousness.

That's besides the point. Whether Jesus or Lazarus or whoever was really dead doesn't matter. Those stories were intended to show the Bible readers how putting your faith in God would lead to great reward.

i know about hte medical reasons , what kind of reward , going to heaven big friggin deal

Living for all eternity in paradise?

That is a pretty big deal.

how do you know its "paradise" , for all you know its could be nohing , it could be a trick

Ah yes god created us, gives us intelligence and free will, sends his only son to earth to be murdered for our sins and in the end when we die just before we melt into nothingness god pops and says ''just kidding''!!!

that would be funny , my point you don't know he could !

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

Yes i completely agree it's impossible for a man with no technology involved to walk on water............but then most men aren't born with the spirit of god are they.

Or then again, the walking on water account could have been somewhat garbled in the first place.

It only takes a tiny bit of diversion from the original story, a tiny little mis-translation of the Bible, and it can result in stories such as that.

Nine_Inch_Nails:

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

I believe they is much more to life than what we see.

Viva La Stupid:

Nine_Inch_Nails:

Viva La Stupid:

NeoSteph:

Bloodraine:

NeoSteph:

History can be just as flawed as the bible, individuals write different accounts of what happened as the years change truth can become manipulated.

for example it's a very taught idea that thomas edison invented electricity when in fact it was a lesser known scientist named swann.

the government decides what books our taught in school, the next time you open a text book remember that every page has been screened to make sure it fits the accounts they want to be known.

That may be so, I won't dispute that...

But which would you rather believe?

History or the Bible?

I personally would put my faith in History. Yes, History will always be jaded and become less accurate over time...as generations pass mistakes will be made and things will become hidden and forgotten with the passing years.

Actually, there's a point. Couldn't the same be true of the Bible?

I don't see them as different The Bible is apart of our history it's one of the only standing documents that pre-dates roman times.

read it like a textbook, what you said is basically what I say you can't 100 percent trust something thats written by others.

the whole idea of the bible is not to follow fact but to follow faith, blind sided as that maybe.

but if you have common sense , its obvious that someone can not rise form the dead 3 days after his death
or walk on water , what the hell it says

I believe they is much more to life than what we see.

i do too , just not in heaven