Author | Message |
---|
XcoreJessio King For A Couple Of Days
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 4180 | May 28th, 2005 at 09:30am So are you pro or anti? I'm a mixture of both. I'm against animal testing if it is for the use of make-up or cosmetic. Just buy your bloody stuff at t ashop that dosn't test it on animals. A life of an animal should come before vanity. But if it is for medical needs I am for it. Sometimes it dosn't work and has side effects, but in other cases such as insulin, if it wasn't for animal testing my closest friend would be dead as she is diabetic. |
american_idiot_94 Falling In Love With The Board
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 9482 | May 28th, 2005 at 09:33am i think its wrong to test on animals for cosmetic reseans, if people are the ones who want the product test it on them. but if its for medical reseans...i guess i think thats ok, though its still cruel it can save lives |
Woodrow Derenberger Moderator
Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 63354 | May 28th, 2005 at 09:43am i don't use any soaps that don't say they didn't test on animals. i think its cruel. it should only be used for life saving medications and such. |
girl almighty GSBitch
Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 76615 | May 28th, 2005 at 11:44am im for animal testing involving drugs. id rather some rats died than my family died of cancer. i know that sounds extreme and slefish, but im sure most people would put their family or friends over a mouse.
im against it when they test make - up on animals though. they also test ribena and lucozade on animals, which is just stupid.
we should test drugs etc. on murderers and rapists - ian huntly would make a good lab rat |
rock00chick Geek
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 490 | May 28th, 2005 at 11:50am i think if it's for medical research that could help save lives or stop pain and suffering then sure, animals can help, as can humans. But if its just to make another version of a painkiller that's already on the market and has been for years, then what's the point??? Also i think it's wrong to kill an animal just so a human can look a little bit better, (or not, in some cases) |
*_whatsername_* Geek
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 327 | May 28th, 2005 at 12:33pm I've got these leaflets which exposes animal testing, this company called Procter and Gamble is testing on animals on loads of big brands, it's horrid what they do. |
rock00chick Geek
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 490 | May 28th, 2005 at 12:52pm yer, i saw these pictures of what they do to animals, and i was like "aw...thts horrible" me and my old mates used to oppose stuff like that, but where i live now, if you try and oppose anything, you get put in jail or something...its annoying |
GreenFlySoup Jackass
Age: 39 Gender: Female Posts: 1163 | May 28th, 2005 at 03:54pm i think science has come far enough for them to be able to not have to test on animals. I always thought that an animals DNA structure was completely different to a humans so when drugs were tested on animals and didn't effect them it doesn't neccessarily mean it wouldn't affect humans. But then if that was true they wouldn't be testing on animals in the first place.
I don't think it is right, i just hope they will soon find new ways of testing things out because, animals have feelings too and if humans were ever put through what they put animals through i think they would have a big wake up call. Disgusting |
† Lestat † Idiot
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 847 | May 28th, 2005 at 04:00pm I think cosmetic testing is wrong but if its for medical research they i agree with it |
Extraordinary-Girl Geek
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 421 | May 28th, 2005 at 04:05pm I think it's really cruel
I try to buy as much make up as possible at Body Shop, there u can be sure of that they haven't test it on animals |
Lunchbox King For A Couple Of Days
Age: 34 Gender: Female Posts: 3180 | May 28th, 2005 at 04:21pm I'm against animal testing. We can test that stuff on people it would give better results. I don't mean inocent people, I mean like Saddam Husein and Bush |
GreenFlySoup Jackass
Age: 39 Gender: Female Posts: 1163 | May 28th, 2005 at 04:24pm that's what i meant by my post surely an animals genetic make up reacts differently to a humans. How they can they be so sure of everything when they've never tested a human? |
girl almighty GSBitch
Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 76615 | May 28th, 2005 at 04:27pm GreenFlySoup:that's what i meant by my post surely an animals genetic make up reacts differently to a humans. How they can they be so sure of everything when they've never tested a human?
sometimes they pay skint people to test makeup and stuff on after animals... you have to be very skint |
XcoreJessio King For A Couple Of Days
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 4180 | May 28th, 2005 at 06:34pm A guy on another message board, works in a hospital and people from PETA, sent letters to the hospital threating to blow it up. Stupid wankers. I bet half of them use medicine which is tested on animals. |
american_idiot_94 Falling In Love With The Board
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 9482 | May 28th, 2005 at 06:35pm *Love is paranoid*:A guy on another message board, works in a hospital and people from PETA, sent letters to the hospital threating to blow it up. Stupid wankers. I bet half of them use medicine which is tested on animals.
thats probably true.... |
Lunchbox King For A Couple Of Days
Age: 34 Gender: Female Posts: 3180 | May 28th, 2005 at 06:38pm american_idiot_94:*Love is paranoid*:A guy on another message board, works in a hospital and people from PETA, sent letters to the hospital threating to blow it up. Stupid wankers. I bet half of them use medicine which is tested on animals.
thats probably true....
There always are fanatics. They aren't allways animal rights organizations, they have religious fanatics in the world too. I don't use stuff that's tested on animals. And to tell you the truth, nivea pruduct are just fine, and avon mascara is better than that maxfactor overrated stuff any way. |
Cassie <3 King For A Couple Of Days
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 3325 | May 28th, 2005 at 06:40pm I don't agree with it. I think it's wrong. Just don't put harmful shit it make-up, and there's no need to test on Animals. |
Lunchbox King For A Couple Of Days
Age: 34 Gender: Female Posts: 3180 | May 28th, 2005 at 06:46pm xForgetting Whatsernamex:I don't agree with it. I think it's wrong. Just don't put harmful shit it make-up, and there's no need to test on Animals.
egzactly |
Project Mayhem Shoot Me, I'm A Newbie
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 46 | May 28th, 2005 at 11:23pm I don't see why they can't just use us useful humans for testing. If it's for humans, then I think it should be tested on humans. |
I ARE TRISH.HEAR ME ROAR! King For A Couple Of Days
Age: - Gender: - Posts: 2487 | May 29th, 2005 at 01:49am Best Name I Ever Had:I don't see why they can't just use us useful humans for testing. If it's for humans, then I think it should be tested on humans. because its too cruel to do on humans. i did a report on this. its very...cruel. they say its too cruel to do on humans so they do it on animals. because they have no 'feelings' |